![](https://australiaawardsindonesia.org/assets/front/images/news-thumb.png)
30 August 2024
Join Our Lecture on “Climate Change Impacts on Stormwater Drainage Systems”
How prepared is our urban infrastructure to withstand the growing challenges of climate change? Join... Read More
The Australia Awards are prestigious, transformational scholarships and short courses offered to emerging leaders for study, research and professional development in Australia
13 Oct 2021
Project leader: Mrs. Dr Pradytia Pertiwi
Level of education and university: PhD, Disaster Risk Reduction, The University of Sydney
Collaborating Organisations: Gema Difabel Mamuju
Project Location: Sleman, Banda Aceh, and Mamuju.
Activity Type: Research & Development and innovation
Sector: Disaster Prevention and Management
Project Rationale:
Indonesia is highly prone to natural hazards. Being situated in the “Ring of Fire,” which contributes to 90% of tectonic activity, has led to major earthquake disasters (BNPB, 2016). In 2018, Indonesia accounted for nearly half of the world’s disaster-related deaths, with 5,510 casualties (Centre for Epidemiology of Disaster, 2019). This was a result of two major earthquakes in West Nusa Tenggara and Central Sulawesi that shook Indonesia just two months apart.
Indonesia's overall disaster risk index has been steadily lowering since 2015, from ‘very high’ to ‘high’ (United Nations University, 2015; Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft & Ruhr University Bochum, 2020), due to, among other factors, the Indonesian Government’s programs to build disaster preparedness, such as Desa Tangguh Bencana (Disaster Resilient Villages) (BNPB, 2019). This program aims to establish self-contained villages that have the ability to recognise local hazards and organise community resources to increase the capacity to reduce disaster risk (BNPB, 2017).
The psychological aspects of community preparedness, however, have not been highlighted in community-based disaster preparedness programs such as Desa Tangguh Bencana. This is not specific Indonesia. A systematic review from Boylan and Lawrence (2020) reported that in the extensive literature about preparedness for natural hazard events worldwide, the primary focus has been on understanding and improving physical preparedness, while there has been less attention to psychological preparedness. Scholars such as Roudini et al. (2017) find that higher levels of householder psychological, or mental preparedness have been found to be associated with greater material preparedness, more effective stress management during a disaster event, and decreased likelihood of experiencing mental health problems in the aftermath.
Take the recent West Sulawesi earthquake in early 2021 for example. During the 6.2 magnitude earthquake, locals were caught unprepared and media such as Detik.com (Febriady, 2021) reported that many of those affected by the earthquake, especially local migrants, escaped the scene instead of helping to respond to the disaster and deliver aid. One of this project’s team members, who is Mamuju-based, observed that among those who were 'escaping' were psychologists. This caused quite a significant delay in psychological aid at the time, leaving the affected communities, those who are more at-risk, such as people with disabilities and seniors, at risk of developing psychological problems post-disaster.
In a contrasting example, another community in Magelang, Yogyakarta, was exposed to the risk of an active Merapi volcano a few months before Mamuju’s earthquake. As reported by the online news portal Merdeka.com (Lubabah, 2021), villagers of Krinjin self-evacuated to the safer neighbouring village of Deyangan, ahead of local government's instruction. This community had planned ahead for the needs of the most at-risk and vulnerable communities and mobilised their own resources in this evacuation (Lubabah, 2021).
The two examples above point to what Morrissey and Reser (2003) describe as psychological preparedness. These authors argue that psychological preparedness enhances people's ability to appraise information and make decisions about challenging circumstances, increase the likelihood of people anticipating the nature of the risks they face and so lay a foundation for the enhancing the efficacy of other preparedness development initiatives. There are at least eight published self-report measures of psychological preparedness (McLennan, Marques & Every, 2020), but none is developed within the Indonesian context (Palupi, 2021). Further, there has not been a community-based disaster preparedness program that focuses on improving awareness and action on psychological preparedness.
Project Beneficiaries:
Priority Development Area:
Health Security
Link with Australian organisation:
Centre for Disability Research and Policy (CDRP), The University of Sydney
Share this article on:
This website uses cookies to improve your website experience. We may also use cookies to analyse website data so that we can improve our online services. To find out more visit our privacy policy.